HOME
LIST OF ARTICLES
CONTACT US


hanksgiving Day, 1929 marked the realization of a decade-long dream for James Sullivan, business manager for Texas A&M's athletic department, as a new $365,000 concrete stadium welcomed a Who's Who of state dignitaries and thousands of football fans.  The traditional clash between the University of Texas and the agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas provided a backdrop for proud Aggies to show off their new stadium. Even the President of the University of Texas, H. Y. Benedict, congratulated A&M on the occasion. Kyle Field, with 32,890 permanent seats and 5,000 temporary seats at the South end, prompted A&M's student newspaper, The Battalion, to report that "voice amplifiers will be used so that the words of the speakers will carry clearly to the fans seated throughout the huge structure...the completed stadium gives A. and M. College one of the finest athletic plants in the South." To round out the day, A&M beat Texas 13-0.

   Here, at last, was the base of Kyle Field as we know it today. Five sections (West stands) of the stadium were begun in 1927 at a cost of $100,000 and put into service the following year. The remaining sixteen sections, including the "U-shaped section" or "Horseshoe," were begun on July 8, 1929 and completed on October 18th at a cost of $265,000.
   Longtime Architecture Professor and A&M Archivist Ernest Langford '13 and Professor Carl E. Sandstedt '28 prepared the structural design of the sixteen sections and were appointed by the college as "supervisors of construction." 


Langford later wrote:  In making our drawings we had shown that the units which form the U-section of the plan were to have their lengths and positions established by a system of coordinates rather than angles.  That was something new to the contractor's superintendent so much so infact that he declared the 'whole mess' to be impractical and challenged us to lay out the units ourselves! That was a challenge which we simply had to accept. So we countered by saying that we would first set a point on the opposite side of the field and then work around the "U to it. Whereupon a preliminary point was established, and a 2"x 2" stake driven into the ground, and then the exact point fixed by driving an eight-penny common nail into the stake. We then declared that when we came back to that point after working our way around the "U" we would arrive within the circle described by the head of the nail.  Well, some four hours later we were ready to check the accuracy of our 'impractical" method of coordinates. A pencil line had been drawn as a diameter on the head of the nail when it was driven in the stake. All that remained to be done was to describe an arc of a circle from the last point established and hope that the arc would cut the diameter within the circle. 

The honor of swinging the arc was accorded the superintendent. With that he stretched the tape taut, set a pencil at the proper figure on the tape, described his arc--and crossed the diameter one-sixteenth of an inch within the circle!

   From this moment until the last load test of the stadium, the two "impractical professors" had the last word when it came to "questions of doubt."

© 1999 Cushing Library